Skip to content

The Chinese gender chart: does it work?

The short answer

No: every test of the chart we found came out no better than chance. Tested on 2,840,755 Swedish births, it was “no better at predicting the sex of a baby than tossing a coin.” At a Boston hospital, it was right for about half of 38,394 babies. Boys and girls are born in nearly equal numbers, so any guess comes true about half the time.

Below: how to read the chart, the royal-tomb story, what each test found, the “2026” and “2027” charts, and what does tell boy from girl.

What is the Chinese gender chart?

The Chinese gender chart, also called the Chinese gender calendar or predictor, is a grid that claims to tell you whether you’ll have a boy or a girl. You look up two things: the mother’s age and the month the baby was conceived, both counted on the Chinese lunar calendar (Villamor and colleagues, 2010).

In China it’s known as the Qing Palace Table (清宫表), and it’s popular there too. In mainland China, it was consistently a more popular search on Baidu than ultrasonography in the years up to 2021, a 2023 study in American Anthropologist found. There, the authors note, it is “currently illegal to use ultrasonography to identify fetal sex.” People “often exhibit interest in the predictive accuracy” of the chart, the authors wrote, “even though they may not necessarily believe in it” (Hong and Zinin, 2023).

That’s a good spirit to play it in: as a folk tradition and a game, like the old wives’ tales in our boy or girl quiz. A calendar can’t see your baby. A scan or a blood test detects the baby’s sex, from anatomy or chromosomes.

How to read the Chinese gender chart

Chart sites and the researchers who tested the chart describe the same three steps (Villamor and colleagues, University of Michigan):

  1. Work out the mother’s lunar age at conception. In traditional Chinese counting, a baby is 1 year old at birth and gains a year at each Lunar New Year, one chart site explains (Chinese Fortune Calendar). So your lunar age is 1 or 2 years more than your age in years, except for some women born in late January or February, near Lunar New Year. The chart covers lunar ages 18 to 45.
  2. Work out the lunar month of conception. Researchers testing the chart in Sweden and Boston dated conception to 14 days after the first day of the last period. A conversion table then turns that date into a lunar month, from 1 to 12 (Hong Kong Observatory).
  3. Find the square where the two meet. Find your age along one side of the grid and the month along the other. The square where they meet says boy or girl.

Converting dates takes “non-trivial calendrical calculations,” the Swedish researchers noted, and various websites offer to do it for you.

Why two sites can give you two answers

Sites don’t count the age the same way. SneakPeek’s blog says to “Add 1 to your age at conception” (SneakPeek, 2025). The Bump gives a formula: “the current year in the lunar calendar, minus your birth year in the lunar calendar, plus one” (The Bump, 2026). For part of each year, that formula comes to 2 more than your age, not 1. A year’s difference moves you to another line of the grid, and the square there may say the opposite.

Where the chart comes from: the royal tomb story

The origin story comes in several versions. The Vancouver doctors who tested the chart wrote that it was “supposedly discovered in a Royal tomb near Beijing.” The Swedish team cited a website saying it was “buried in a tomb near Beijing for almost 700 years.” Other versions tie it to the Qing dynasty’s imperial court (The Bump). Others say it first appeared in a newspaper in the 1970s: in Taiwan, according to one chart site, or in Hong Kong, according to another (Chinese Fortune Calendar, SneakPeek).

We couldn’t find a record that confirms any of them, and neither could others who looked. The Vancouver doctors “were unable to determine its authenticity” (Ostler and Sun, CMAJ, 1999). Even the site that credits a Taiwanese newspaper calls the tomb story “not true.”

The Bump, in an article updated in 2026, quotes two historians of medicine. Yang Li, who studies the history of modern Chinese medicine at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, “hasn’t found any definitive historical evidence” for the Qing story. She thinks the chart may be a relatively recent arrival, “circulated primarily through popular media and the internet in recent decades” (The Bump).

Chinese medicine did have birth charts, called chantu. They date back more than 1,000 years, to the Song dynasty, and were posted in the birthing room to show which direction a mother should face during delivery, The Bump reports. Margaret Ng Wee-Siang, a historian of Eastern medicine at the College of Wooster, says the chart found online today is “too simple, and it doesn’t coincide with anything about Chinese calendars.”

What happened when researchers tested it

We found five tests that checked the chart’s answers against each baby’s actual sex. In date order:

  • Vancouver, Canada, 1999: 20 women. Two Vancouver doctors recruited 20 women at 26 to 34 weeks of an uncomplicated pregnancy. They converted each mother’s birth date and month of conception into lunar dates, read the chart, and waited for the births: 10 boys and 10 girls. When the chart said boy, it was right half the time, and the same for girl. Their study “showed no value in the chart for predicting fetal sex” (Ostler and Sun).
  • Texas Woman’s University, 2003: 1,005 births. Ophelia O’Shea compared the chart’s answer, from the mother’s age at conception and the month she conceived, with the sex at birth. She found “no correlation between gender predicted using the Chinese lunar calendar and actual gender at birth.” The abstract doesn’t say where the births took place or give a percentage (O’Shea, 2003).
  • Boston, 2009: 38,394 babies. Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital checked the chart against the records of single-baby deliveries there from January 1995 to June 2008. They dated conception to 14 days after the first day of the last period. Using the mother’s age on the Western calendar, the chart was right for 19,346 of the 38,394 babies (50.4%); with her lunar age, the result was about the same. It “was no better than a coin toss,” they concluded. Their report is a short conference abstract, not a full paper (Katz and Wylie, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009).
  • Sweden, 2010: 2,840,755 births. A team from the University of Michigan, Harvard and Sweden’s Karolinska Institutet applied the chart to single births in Sweden from 1973 to 2006. They left out mothers born outside Sweden, to keep to one time zone, as well as those with no date for their last period and those outside the chart’s ages. Calendar software did the lunar conversions. Tested on 2,840,755 Swedish births, the chart was “no better at predicting the sex of a baby than tossing a coin.” In the university’s words, it was “correct about 50 percent of the time” (Villamor and colleagues, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2010, University of Michigan).
  • Ankara, Turkey, 2023: 17,580 births. Researchers checked the chart against births at Koru Ankara Hospital from January 2017 to January 2023. Of 21,675 births, they analyzed 17,580, after leaving out twins, IVF pregnancies, and mothers whose last period was uncertain or whose records were missing, among others. They dated conception to 14 days after the first day of the last period, and got the chart’s answers from calculators on chart websites. They found “no agreement” between the chart’s answer and the baby’s sex, and concluded that the chart “is not a reliable method for determining sex” (Jafarzade and colleagues, Actual Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023).

In Sweden, accuracy didn’t change with the year of conception, the mother’s age, her education, her body mass index (BMI) or how many times she’d given birth.

There is no information on the rationale behind the chart and we couldn’t think of a biological basis for it.

Eduardo Villamor, lead author of the Swedish study, University of Michigan, 2010

Does converting to the lunar calendar matter?

If the chart got your family wrong, was it the conversion? The tests say no. The Swedish team re-ran the chart with Western ages and months, as if someone had skipped the conversion, and the results didn’t substantially change. They also entered 1,000 randomly chosen mothers’ details into the most popular chart website, without knowing each baby’s sex. Its answers matched the babies no better than chance. In Boston, the chart scored about 50% with the mother’s Western age and about 50% with her lunar age.

Why it seems to work for some families

Because boys and girls are born in nearly equal numbers. In Sweden, slightly more boys than girls are born every year: about 105 to 107 boys for every 100 girls, Statistics Sweden says (Statistics Sweden). In the U.S., the figure stayed between 1,046 and 1,059 boys per 1,000 girls from 1940 to 2002, the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics reported (CDC). That’s about 51 boys in every 100 babies.

Any guess starts at half

A coin, a chart or any guess that ignores the baby will be right about half the time.

Hits get retold

Two researchers found 114 recorded predictions of a baby’s sex in historical Chinese records, made by various methods. The vast majority were written down as right.

Lucky streaks happen

With three children, about 1 in 8 families would see a coin come up right all three times. That family has a great story about the chart.

In the texts handed down, over 90% of predictions were recorded as right. Since chance alone gives about 50%, Hong and Zinin concluded that about 90% of the failed predictions were “either not recorded or fabricated as successes.” Failed predictions in everyday stories “may simply be ignored and not talked about,” they write. Predicting a baby’s sex is a human habit, not a Chinese one: it “has been a common practice in many human societies,” they note.

Chart sites have claimed far more. The University of Michigan noted website claims of “up to 93 percent,” and the Boston abstract cited claims of 93% to 99%. None of the tests came close.

The chart’s answer is a guess that comes true about half the time.

Enjoy it, but as the Swedish team advises, don’t paint the nursery by it. If you play, play fair: write the chart’s answer down before any scan, and count the misses along with the hits.

Is there a 2026 or 2027 Chinese gender chart?

Search for the chart and you’ll find “2026” and “2027” editions. It’s the same chart. It takes only two things, the mother’s lunar age and the lunar month of conception, so there’s no year in it to update. Even SneakPeek, which sells an at-home gender blood test, says the 2025, 2024 and later charts are “one and the same.”

What changes each year is the calendar. Lunar months start on different Western dates from year to year. Lunar New Year is the first day of the first lunar month. It fell on February 17 in 2026 and falls on February 6 in 2027, the Hong Kong Observatory’s tables show (2026, 2027). So a conception on February 10 counts as the 12th lunar month in 2026, but the 1st lunar month in 2027.

A dated page can help with that year’s conversion. It can’t make the chart more accurate: in the Swedish test, accuracy didn’t change with the year of conception, across 34 years of births.

What can tell you boy or girl

These read the baby, not the calendar, though none is 100% sure. When can you find out your baby’s gender? puts every option on one timeline.

  • From about 10 weeks: a blood test your doctor or midwife orders. Cell-free DNA screening (NIPT) screens for chromosomal conditions, and the sex is a side result some labs report. Cleveland Clinic says it “can also tell whether XX or XY chromosomes are present,” and calls that result “highly accurate, but not 100% accurate” (Cleveland Clinic). Kits are also sold for use at home: what’s known about at-home gender blood tests.
  • From about 12 weeks, at the earliest: an ultrasound. A scan reads the baby’s genitals. A 2009 review advises against trying before 12 weeks, because “this early, it is relatively inaccurate” (Odeh and colleagues, 2009).
  • About 18 to 22 weeks: the anatomy scan. At this medical scan in the U.S., “In most cases, you can also learn the sex,” Cleveland Clinic says, depending on the baby’s position (Cleveland Clinic). In England, the NHS says finding out isn’t part of its screening program and depends on your hospital’s policy, and that a sonographer can’t be “100% certain” (NHS).

Collecting predictions for fun? The heart-rate tale, Ramzi theory and skull theory each get a guide that weighs the research. Nub theory is different: it reads an early scan, and studies have tested it, though a guess from a photo isn’t the same test.

When is your due date?

Your date stays on this device. We never see it.

Trade the lunar calendar for your due date: the planner shows which of our sessions you could book now and which open next. What you type stays on your device.

A look, not a lookup: finding out in Glendale

The chart always has an answer. We don’t always, and our promise says what happens then: “If we can’t tell with confidence, we don’t guess. You come back, and the second look costs nothing.” No ultrasound can promise 100%.

At our studio in Glendale, Los Angeles County, our Gender Confirmation is a 2D scan, “the classic black-and-white picture,” with 8 black-and-white prints. We book from 13 weeks, and we’re surest from 15. If you can wait until 15, do: we’re more confident, and a second look is less likely. Once we have a clear view it can be over in 2 minutes. If your baby is being shy, we take longer.

It’s a keepsake, not a medical exam: it doesn’t replace the anatomy scan or any appointment with your doctor or midwife. Nor does it check your baby’s anatomy or health. The FDA and the AIUM discourage scans done only for keepsakes (FDA, AIUM); you can read what each says in Safety, in plain words. When you’re ready for a look, see finding out from 13 weeks, confirming what you’ve been told and prices.

Questions

Is the Chinese gender chart accurate?

No more than a coin toss. Tested on 2,840,755 Swedish births from 1973 to 2006, it was “no better at predicting the sex of a baby than tossing a coin.” At Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, it was right for about half of 38,394 babies delivered from 1995 to 2008.

How do you read the Chinese gender chart?

You look up the mother’s lunar age at conception and the lunar month of conception, both converted from Western dates to the Chinese lunar calendar. The square where they meet on the grid says boy or girl. In every test we found, that answer was no better than chance.

How do I work out my lunar age for the Chinese gender chart?

Traditional Chinese counting makes a baby 1 year old at birth and adds a year at each Lunar New Year. So your lunar age is 1 or 2 years more than your age in years, except for some women born in late January or February. Chart sites simplify this in different ways, so two sites can give two answers. In tests, the chart was no better than chance either way.

Is there a new Chinese gender chart for 2026 or 2027?

No, the chart is the same every year. What changes is the lunar calendar used to convert your dates: the Hong Kong Observatory’s tables put Lunar New Year on February 17 in 2026 and February 6 in 2027. In a Swedish test of births from 1973 to 2006, the chart’s accuracy didn’t change with the year.

Why was the Chinese gender chart right for us?

Chance, as far as the tests can tell. Boys and girls are born in nearly equal numbers (in the U.S. and Sweden, about 51 in every 100 babies are boys), so any guess that ignores the baby is right about half the time. Families it worked for have a story to tell, and misses are easy to forget.

Where does the Chinese gender chart come from?

Its origin isn’t documented. One story says it was found in a royal tomb near Beijing after almost 700 years, and another that the Qing court used it. Doctors who tested the chart couldn’t confirm the first, and a historian of Chinese medicine has found no definitive evidence for the second. She thinks it may have spread mainly through popular media and the internet in recent decades.

Sources

  1. Villamor E, Dekker LH, Svensson T, Cnattingius S, “Accuracy of the Chinese lunar calendar method to predict a baby’s sex: a population-based study”, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2010.
  2. Hong Z, Zinin S, “The psychology and social dynamics of fetal sex prognostication in China: Evidence from historical data”, American Anthropologist, 2023.
  3. University of Michigan, “Chinese lunar calendar: Don’t paint the nursery just yet”, news release, May 25, 2010.
  4. Chinese Fortune Calendar, “2026 Chinese Baby Gender Predictor, Baby Gender Pregnancy Calendar Chart”, chart website, checked October 2026.
  5. Hong Kong Observatory, “Gregorian-Lunar Calendar Conversion Table”, with the tables for 2026 and 2027.
  6. David DiGiovanni, “Chinese Calendar Baby Gender Prediction Calculator”, SneakPeek blog, Myriad Genetics, updated August 3, 2025.
  7. Colleen De Bellefonds, “Chinese Gender Calendar, Chart and Predictor,” medically reviewed by Kendra Segura, MD, The Bump, updated August 24, 2026.
  8. Ostler S, Sun A, “Fetal sex determination: the predictive value of 3 common myths”, CMAJ, 1999.
  9. O’Shea O, “Validity of the Chinese lunar calendar to predict gender”, Texas Woman’s University repository, 2003.
  10. Katz D, Wylie BJ, “568: The Chinese birth calendar for prediction of gender – fact or fiction?”, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009 (conference abstract).
  11. Jafarzade A, Aghayeva S, Mungan TM, Biri A, Ekiz OU, “Predicting baby gender using the Chinese lunar calendar”, Actual Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023.
  12. Statistics Sweden (SCB), “Födda i Sverige” (Births in Sweden), updated February 24, 2026.
  13. National Center for Health Statistics, “More Boys Born Than Girls”, CDC, June 14, 2005.
  14. Cleveland Clinic, “Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)”, updated July 2026.
  15. Odeh M, Grinin V, Kais M, Ophir E, Bornstein J, “Sonographic fetal sex determination”, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2009.
  16. Cleveland Clinic, “20-Week Ultrasound (Anatomy Scan)”, updated 2025.
  17. NHS, “Ultrasound scans in pregnancy”, reviewed 2023.
  18. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Ultrasound Imaging”, 2024.
  19. AIUM, “Prudent Use and Safety of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Pregnancy”, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2020.

This article is general information, not medical advice. Questions about your pregnancy belong with your doctor or midwife.

Keep reading

Ready when you are.

Same-day appointments are often available. Pick a time online, or call and we’ll find one together.